Show summary Hide summary
A Kankakee County judge delayed consideration of post-trial motions in the case of Xandria Harris after her family said they are still deciding on legal representation. The pause, set for next week, extends uncertainty over whether Harris will pursue a challenge to her convictions and when sentencing will occur.
Harris, held at the Jerome Combs Detention Center, joined Thursday’s brief court appearance by video. Present in the courtroom were her current attorney, Cierra Norris, and Kankakee County State’s Attorney Jim Rowe; Judge Kathy Bradshaw-Elliott handled the scheduling matters.
Court action and next steps
Bradley police sergeant murder: sentencing still pending for convicted woman
Longevity habit that may add years to your life: one simple daily change experts recommend
Defense filings submitted since September ask the judge to overturn the jury’s decision and to order a new trial. Norris told the court she is waiting for the official trial transcript, which the defense and outside counsel requested to review before advising Harris’ family on how to proceed.
Because Norris may not remain on the case, she asked the judge to hold off on hearing the post-trial motions until Oct. 9. No sentencing date has been scheduled, and the judge signaled the matter likely will not be resolved before December.
What the convictions mean
On Aug. 21, a jury found Harris guilty of first-degree murder along with related charges tied to a December 2021 shooting. Prosecutors say the attack targeted two Bradley police officers who responded to a report of dogs left in a parked car at a Comfort Inn.
- Victims: Sgt. Marlene Rittmanic was killed; now-retired Officer Tyler Bailey was seriously injured.
- Charges against Harris: First-degree murder, attempted murder, and aggravated battery of a peace officer.
- Co-defendant: Darius Sullivan was convicted of the shooting and is serving life for Rittmanic’s murder plus an 80-year sentence for the attempt on Bailey.
The delayed hearing keeps open procedural options for Harris’ legal team. Access to the full trial transcript will be central to any motion for a new trial or a motion to reconsider the verdict, since it provides the detailed record counsel need to evaluate trial strategy, evidentiary rulings and jury instructions.
Why this matters now
For the victim’s family, law enforcement and the community, the schedule affects closure and the timing of final penalties. For the defense, the extra time allows new or retained counsel to analyze the transcript and decide whether to press appeals or negotiate sentencing positions.
Judge Bradshaw-Elliott’s comment that the case likely won’t conclude by December suggests additional procedural steps are expected, whether in post-trial motions, appointment of new counsel, or pre-sentencing proceedings.
When the matter returns to court on Oct. 9, the judge will revisit the defense’s requests and confirm whether Norris will continue representing Harris or if the family has retained different counsel to pursue the next phase of the case.
